Family Encounters Bigfoot And Recorded Screeching Sound
Bill Brock and his crew recently visited a family in Eddington, Maine and the description of the sighting seems pretty legit. The family describes a Class "A" sighting -- which means they actually got a real good look of the creature and watched it walked away. Later, the family picked up a screeching noise with their audio recorder. Watch the investigation video below:
Peace!!
ReplyDeleteand love!!
DeleteNo comment on the post just the usual "peace"?
DeleteYou dont even pretend to believe very well.
I think it's an important message, and I don't care to leave a comment about the post... What you going to do about it? That, as opposed to you just chiming in to say "Bigfoot don't exist, duh?" as a usual contribution, right?
DeletePosting every day on a Bigfoot blog? You don't pretend to disbelief too convincingly.
Anyone see that womans ufc fight the other day? It was like dmaker obliterating joe.
DeleteArgh yes! What was it now?
DeleteThe last time we conversed, he tried a suppression evidence fallacy along with his usual ad hominem against a long line of scientists who delivered the same verdict on an impartial scientific premise. Even though this was the exact same process of verification to which he adheres to in peer review processes, and even though Nobel Prize winners are calling out the journals he demands be the only vehicle of credibility, for being backward, biased and agenda driven of new and progressive scientific ideas...
Without so much of a smidgen of science to support his ideas against consistent method used to verify physical evidence for a bipedal primate.
Wow.. Like... Totally obliterated.
Yup obliterated.
DeleteJoe sounds like a bad loser.
And the comment at 8:20 constitutes an "obliteration" of anyone other than Dmaker? No wonder you folk need to stick by each other and cheer one another on. You really are that stupid and need it.
DeleteWho's Joe?
Joe is some chump that used to get obliterated on here right before he disapeared and then you showed up saying the exact same tripe and also got obliterated.
DeleteJoe wouldn't last 34 seconds with Ronda much less anyone on this forum.
DeleteYet... Every time I see someone reference me having an alleged obliteration... It always appears to be in reference to occasions where I have an exchange of about ten comments, that ends in me posting scientific evidence that people like you insist isn't there, only for you to disappear?
DeleteWhy am I to believe the same in reference to this Joe chap? Who's Ronda?
Joketomi goes down for the count !
DeleteHis reasoning falls flat on the mat
He taps out and is once again obliterated !
... And then 12:01 wakes up only to have wet himself n the couch again.
Delete: (
I enjoyed that podcast, good stuff Mike. Hey Iktomi.
DeleteGroovy baby yeh!!
ReplyDeleteBossanova!!
DeleteCoyotes. The guy with the pipe said so.
ReplyDeleteIts a Monkeyman!!!!,Its a noise in the woods so of course its a mokeyman.Good Morning Ikblowme!
ReplyDeleteWardens will be interested in an illegal baiting station.
ReplyDelete1,164 backers $104,542 pledged of $100,000 goal 13 days to go
ReplyDeletehttps://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1032329905/missing-411-the-movie
People go missing therefore bigfoot.
DeleteMorons.
People go missing... But it's a small percentage of cases that have the exact same strange, unexplainable circumstances that once all other cases with even a remote chance of natural causes are excluded... Are left that require investigating, along with what should be easily releasable details being disclosed.
DeleteIf it scares you then good.
Any of you guys ever hear a Fisher ? You know,the big weasel.
ReplyDeleteHorrible screeching isn't the half of it.
Just another BF story, among thousands. Unless your a very experienced, and I mean very experienced hunter or trapper, there many animals and birds in the day or in the night that make screams or unusual sounds. A "Fisher Cat' will; sit up in a tree,50 feet from your campsite and scream all night long! A Racoon is another one, on and on it goes.
ReplyDeleteSo, the point is They are not Bigfoots!
Wrong. They are 10 foot apes mimicing a fisher that know about and actively avoid every possible means of identification from humans.
DeleteMissing in Alaska Research Team sayin it be that thar Hairy Man takin tham folks in da boosh
DeleteOregon and Washington Indians agree that the Seeahtik Indians are not less than seven feet tall and some have been seen that were fully eight feet in height. They have hairy bodies like a bear. This is to protect them from the cold as they live entirely in the mountains. They kill their game entirely by hypnotism (infra-sound??). They have great supernatural powers (misunderstood infra-sound??). They also have the gift of ventriloquism, and have deceived many ordinary Indians by throwing their voices.
DeleteThanks for that Ik, I didn't know any of that.
Delete~ Chick
You are always very welcome Chick!!
DeleteDoquebulth, the Changer was the good spirit,seatco(seeahtik) was the dark forest spirit of the northwest also called stick indians...point being if you beleive one native myth you must believe them all, like the earth was flat and the coyote was a fun loving prankster who was brought back to life by his pal the fox every time he died ( couple of kooky k-9's) interesting myth ickyjoe . But it's just folklore. The muckleshoot myth's are a good read
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteHmmmmm... As was put to you before, Native American culture holds the spiritual with the physical in one reality. You must remember also that many Native cultures were not that dissimilar to our own, in that should something evade so well, that they would attribute supernatural powers... Even more understandable for a more spiritual type of people, right? Eagles, beavers, all these things exist in myth and legend yet they are real as well.
DeleteWhen such myths and legends manifest in physical reality, measured by it's impressions on the environment... What does that mean?
The bigfoot film in the 60s was proven a hoax. There is no such thing. Is this site a parody?
ReplyDeleteI'm sorry... The last time I checked, they still haven't found a monkey suit? Are you aware of something that the world doesn't?
DeleteIs this poster rhetorical?
They already proved it m8 go look it up
DeleteReally? You have a monkey suit then?
DeleteLook it up dork
DeleteJust did? Do you have a monkey suit? I can't seem to find one??
Deletelook in your closet next to the sailor moon dress
DeleteSailors and imaginary monkey suits... Anything but show us that your ideas have any standing in the real world, right?
DeleteI recently asked someone who reviews names for acceptance by the ICZN, to look at the Meldrum North American Foot Ape,
ReplyDeleteHere are two of the important parts of his response.
Quote:
My current and preliminary understanding of the nomenclatural status of Meldrum's "scientific" names for supposed bigfoot tracks, "namely" the supposed (ichno)genus Anthropoidipes and the supposed (ichno)species Anthropodipes ameriborealis, is that it provides an example of pseudoscience in the most literal sense. This really surprised me because of Meldrum's academic affiliation and advanced degrees. It appears that since 1931, according to the rules of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature, names for tracks and traces that are not fossils simply have no status whatsoever. Also, casts, other than "natural casts," have no standing as holotypes...
I forgot to mention again above, as I should have, that artificial casts made of plaster or latex or whatever can't serve as holotypes, so that alone would have invalidated Meldrum's names even before, I think, 1931. The editor who was a specialist in fossil tracks should have known this and it is very odd that he didn't see this problem (or didn't care for some reason).
Really? Wonderful! Did he get around to showing that such track castings were faked?
DeleteBusy idiots.
Ouch!
Joe doesnt like it when a scientist correctly dismisses footer nonsense. Life must be suffering for him.
DeleteI would express far more distaste for a source that shows that physical evidence for Sasquatch is nonsense... You people seem to be far more concerned with anything but getting it done though... Now THAT must be suffering.
DeleteWho's Joe?
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/caveman-logic/201109/the-hell-bigfoot...about says it all
Delete... An yet again... Not one shred of data against the evidence.
DeleteThis is becoming a bad habit of yours, yeah?
Wise men speak when they have something to say, fools speak because they have to say something”
Delete― Aristotle
and sandy you are a fool
Still not a shred of data against the evidence? Make that a dirty habit.
DeleteA fool would be someone immersed in a topic daily, only to fail in sourcing at least one argument to help his course... Not to mention naming the wrong author of the quote he references.
(Plato, sigh)
I have been waiting for this information for a long time. Thank you very much for your wonderful post.
ReplyDelete