TimberGiantBigfoot Followers Are Getting A Bit Irritated About His Videos Being Blurry
Someone's gotta tell TimberGiantBigfoot to get a GoPro or something. It seems like every time he claims to get something interesting on video, the worst the quality. TGB has a lot of followers, and some of them are starting to wonder why his videos are so blurry:
"first of all, i am a fan of yours, love your videos, i dont know if its you tube or what it is , but your footage is never quite in focus for me ,its always a little fuzzy, other channels are fine, well the ones in 720 and 1080 are crystal clear, some are like i was standing in the forest right beside the person filming,so is it youtube or the camera? im not hating on you, but your videos would be so much more enjoyable if they were clear ." - Brendon W.
Here's the video where he claims something was following him:
Peace!!
ReplyDeleteStill chasing that non existent ape?
DeleteScience is founded on the premise that those who believe in magic apes need not apply.
DeleteLucky nobody is peddling magic apes then, eh Einstein?
DeleteJust magic half monkeys that are aliens. But they're not.
DeleteDaniel gets it.
DeleteNo Daniel doesn't get it. Ain't nobody got time for that.
DeleteWhen you have an auto-focus and a lot of undergrowth some things in the distance might be blurry. But I agree, the camera he's using doesn't have a very sharp image. He needs to buy another camera.
ReplyDeleteTrue DD
DeleteThe gauntlet has been laid down. Time for better equiptment. Hopefully we see progress
MMC
Won't see much progress from this guy unless he leaves his local park and gets into the woods.
DeleteThose damn joggers are scaring away the suburban sasquatch.
MMG
Kill all hoaxers on sight.
DeleteI am wise and above it all.
MMG
Got patty specimen? If you cant find a patty specimen then patty is not the real deal.
ReplyDeletePeace.
That's actually a negative proof fallacy, Einstein... One of your many shortcomings that I enjoy getting an ego over exposing.
Delete"A stupid man's report of what a clever man says can never be accurate, because he unconsciously translates what he hears into something he can understand."
- Bertrand Russell
LOL Iktomi. When it comes to bigfoot, you're the master of the negative proof fallacy.
DeleteYou'll never see me use it because I have no need to... I use Occam's Razor on the multiple sources of evidence that point to the same conclusion; a bipedal primate, twice the size of normal humans primates.
DeleteOccams razor:
DeleteZero bigfoots therefore bigfoot does not exist.
Hair = dermals = audio = footage = whole cultures = contemporary reports = Occam's Razor.
DeletePlenty found, none caught.
Type occams razor 10 times and a magic monkey man will appear.
DeleteCall it a day on the mushrooms kid.
Delete335, what if the stupid man thinks he's a smart man?
Delete2:20's case would certainly apply.
DeleteIk is jogging the fat kid hard this Monday morning- look at those fat butt cheeks go! So so so sweaty.
DeleteHe's a hoaxer.They all are,some just hide it better than others.Nobody has ever seen a giant monkeyman roaming around,nobody! They've seen bears and the rest are just full of crap.You fools keep buying it so they keep putting it out.
ReplyDeleteIn ten years their will be less than 100 people taking about Bigfoot,it will have run its course by then.out of all the years since 67 only 2 films,PGF and Freeman have even come close to being half real looking.Its sad enough that a no good con man and B.S Bob fooled you but you even buy a video from the admitted hoaxer Freeman lol.There is nothing else out there,the rest are all clear hoaxes and lies,sorry girls but that's just the way it is.
It's funny... You scared little psychos have been banging the same mantra out for years, but we in fact have more and more reputable scientists getting on board asking the questions, just like the most pioneering geneticist in the world, just check out the editorial board of Meldrum's RHI.
Deletehttp://youtu.be/cR2cREt95sU
http://youtu.be/luue2Mv_VNM
http://youtu.be/lOxuRIfFs0w
http://youtu.be/l96zvON3Rk8
http://youtu.be/xI8gcikwUEQ
http://youtu.be/BfuWuhEa3yI
http://youtu.be/ZlMQ9b2lnE4
http://youtu.be/h4QcYdT6keQ
http://youtu.be/cjEWDkcqjXI
... There are plenty of videos, sunshine, you'd have to have a fool's guide's knowledge of the topic to be aware of that. The stuff about Roger Patterson came from a source that has been shown to have manipulated interviews of people in his book, got a costume expert who couldn't make a costume, and got a fat drunk who refused a peer review of his lie detector test... All of which has a countering autobiographer currently putting together a book via the same community, showing that Roger had integrity. There's money in hoaxing a hoax, and certainly money to be made helping children like you sleep better at night. It's funny when someone calls out lies with lies, eh?
Oh... And Freeman's physical evidence forensically evaluated in the woodape link up top, lends further to his credibility as a researcher, though the famous footage is open to debate because of its poor quality.
Roger was a bullshitter way before anyone knew who Greg long was,Either way you can continue beating a dead horse if you want but there's still no monkeyman is there? Meldrum is an attention whore so I dont buy anything he has anything to do with and when it comes to Freeman you can try and justify it all you want but he did admit to hoaxing which makes him a hoaxer does it not? Iktomi you can post all the links you want but at the end of the day there's still no monkeyman.It is impossible for such a thing to be roaming around,would have been found and accepted by science by now,as a matter of FACT it would have happened a long time ago but keep your faith if you like but I notice you're not confident enough to back it up with your real name just in case eh?
DeleteWell there we have it. Joe has just proven the greatest discovery in modern anthropology, on an obscure bigfoot blog. I await the global media frenzy on the discovery of the century.
DeleteOr alternately you are full of sh*t and you have sweet f*ck all.
Ok then pal, how about you present a case as to how it was "we'll known Roger was a bullshitter" before Greg Long came along? It's very simple, putting things up in writing doesn't make it true unless you can back it up... And by backing it up, I don't mean mere cynicism on the part of silly denialists like you. Roger Patterson had lose ends to tie up before he died, with a drive to getting his family I'm a financial position to be able to sustain themselves in his absence... Sadly this is the case with many who are terminally ill, but se would have you believe that this is reason to condemn integrity. If you can't present a case against the source in hand that is endorsed by scientists, then there is your monkey man.
DeleteMeldrum's has for the attention of none other than the best conservationist in the world, putting forward's in his book. Check out his editorial board; some of the best around, if he's a whore then he sure does get it right! Ha ha!! Freeman, when asked on TV if he designed tracks, he said yes but what the clever editing doesn't tell you is that he made his own to see if toe be doing could be achieved in false casts. This has been put in two books and is common knowledge, let me know if you want that referenced. Think about it... Why would someone make try and make a career as a researcher, only to admit on TV that he was a hoaxer? You people aren't the best with logic but hey, I expect nothing else.
There is nothing in scientific theory that states that something has to exist in type specimen for it to be real, especially when we have physical, biological and published audio evidence of an unknown bipedal primate. Science, by now HAS been successful in locating it's physical sign, we merely don't have a MODERN type specimen to classify and to go with it.
I thought you people knew my name? Didn't you just post under anon mode?
"A hypocrite despises those whom he deceives, but has no respect for himself. He would make a dupe of himself too, if he could."
-William Hazlitt
The books Bigfoot of the Blues or Walla Walla Bigfoot (both authored by Vance Orchard) go at length regarding the Sasquatch in the Utimala range and Mill creek water shed areas, both were visited by Paul Freeman about five times a week after his encounter as a forestry worker. There are at least 15 to 20 people local to that area who had encountered Sasquatch, four of these became friends to Freeman and followed up on sighting reports and footprints. Any way, Freeman stated he made a fake track to see if indeed he could duplicate what they were finding and what this showed was a faked track could not achieve the same kind of movement shown with flexing over rocks and curling toes into mud and sticks.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
Delete4:49... I can't prove the existence of "Bigfoot", just the existence of a bipedal primate, twice the size of normal human primates.
DeleteIf I thought you could keep up, I would explain to you scientific principle called Occam's Razor.
Keep typing occams razor and everything will be okay.
DeleteActually... Stick to the mushrooms, it might keep you preoccupied.
Delete512, the media should be calling you any moment now. That's really exciting!
DeleteThanks, I'll be thinking of you.
DeleteFrom a book review regarding The Nature Of The Beast: In an unnumbered chapter after Chapter 27,entitled "Postscript", Sykes details an intriguing finding from a hair sample from Dr.Henner Fahrenbach. It had a result that Sykes is still pondering, and we may hear about in the future. The DNA from a "Sasquatch" from Walla Walla matched that of a feral "individual from Uzbekistan", Sykes exclaims.
DeleteNC my brother!! It's exciting because the hair fibre (recovered by Freeman and two other government employees in a sighting where tracks were found) has massive consistency with many other hair fibres that have uniform morphology!!
DeleteShame that evidence has not been substanciated. Oh well maybe next time. Ha ha.
DeleteYou'll get it substantiated by the best geneticist in the world son, and like it.
DeleteThank you,lktomi!
DeleteSykes has yet to prove anything despite 3 tv shows, a paper and a book.
Delete3:00 a.m.,you are a buffoon and I quote; "In ten years less than 100 people will be talking about Bigfoot,it will have run it's course."The Loch Ness monster has been in the know for hundreds of years and is still the most popular cryptid in the world,Bigfoot is second,so I hate to burst your bubble but it looks like this BF phenomenon will be around long after your stinking corpse has turned to dust.
Delete6:52... That's because he's yet to publish his latest.
DeleteTick, tock, tick, tock...
3:00 a.m.,you are a buffoon and I quote; "In ten years less than 100 people will be talking about Bigfoot,it will have run it's course."The Loch Ness monster has been in the know for hundreds of years and is still the most popular cryptid in the world,Bigfoot is second,so I hate to burst your bubble but it looks like this BF phenomenon will be around long after your stinking corpse has turned to dust.
DeleteIts like joe forgot what a fool he made of himself last time he claimed "sykes is coming"
Deletehttp://www.techtimes.com/articles/44347/20150406/dna-test-suggests-russian-apewoman-zana-was-not-human-and-yeti-may-not-be-a-myth.htm
DeleteTick, tock, tick, tock...
7:07 Or the flaming ass you make of yourself here 397 times a day on a bigfoot blog.
DeleteIktomi, please stick to copying and pasting from other sources, because your own mangled writing style is impossible to read.
DeleteYour literary shortcomings ain't anyone else's problem kid... Get your parents to help, they help enough with your homework anyway.
DeleteYou should find a child to help with proofreading your incoherent posts.
DeleteNobody else seems to have an issue darling, you must have an inferiority complex and be trying a little too hard.
DeleteHow many bigfoot clips aren't blurry?
ReplyDeleteThis is another guy that's about worthless....when it comes to Bigfoot !
ReplyDeleteAnyone got any good evidence?
ReplyDeleteNope.
DeleteTheres a lot of questionable evidence which therefore does not count as evidence when held to scientific standards. There are also examples of each of these types of evidence being hoaxed.
Long story short: bigfoot dont exist.
Sure do
DeleteHave you seen yo sisters feet ?
"Nope"?
DeleteI'm sorry... What are your credentials to be questioning a long like of forensic experts?? If it's so "questionable", then you'll be able to find a means of countering their collective opinion then, right? You can't hoax forensic evidence I'm afraid, as much as you would pray for it to be the case. The tile that Crowley for example sent Jimmy Chilcutt was covered in artificial ridge artefacts from the pouring process... This was jumped all over by people like you because you are looking for closure, but what people like you don't do is consult the scientific experts; something that should come very naturally to anyone impartially looking for answers, a true sceptic that is supposed to reserve judgement.
The three casts in question that Chilcutt examined for example, were not covered in artefacts... This is because when you are walking barefoot on the forest floor, the foot comes in contact with both fallen leaves and the soil in making an impression. Therefore, these artefacts would be present in consistency right across the different soil areas of the foot fall and they're not. The delta ridges on prints change directions over 45 degrees; they converge and deviate. This is a major indicator that the dermals are biological and as Chulcutt states, these do not appear on any of the artefacts. They would have to have a knowledge of primate dermals (that not many do), have a lottery win's chance of faking the same biological idea, and then fool multiple forensic experts. The things that are and given to you as scientific facts are done by the same level of impartial, consistent scientists that shows that the dermals are genuine. Crying circular logic doesn't begin to counter it.
It's ok 6:13... You're learning I guess.
One word to trump that wall of text meltdown that noone will bother reading:
DeleteNope.
It's lucky that that word, along with your unqualified, uneducated opinion counts for nothing other than reassuring your own fears of the boogeyman.
Delete... Or does it?
: p
Its lucky that your zero amounts of evidence counts for nothing but a mental medical condition.
DeleteI'm not the one requiring something to substantiate my claims, son. Do you sit in front of the mirror eating pizza saying "I'm not fat, I'm NOT fat!"
DeleteNot many ^
DeleteAnother day of joe struggling to convince anyone bigfoot exists
ReplyDeleteI like Joe, but I don't understand that. I say fvck the trolls
Delete6:17... Who's trying to convince denialists like you? I'm sure Joe just enjoys using you as the archetype idiot who watches things like Finding Bigfoot and thinks he can express contempt in full view of the supposed facts.
DeleteIt's ok... People like me are here to help.
^ Never helped anybody but himself.
DeleteHe`s "one of those"..sly,backstabbing,morally lacking.
That's right darling, I hope you can look yourself in the mirror.
DeleteI think Bigfoot is blurry, that's the problem. It's not the photographer's fault. Bigfoot is blurry, and that's extra scary to me. There's a large, out-of-focus monster roaming the countryside. Run, he's fuzzy, get out of here.
ReplyDeleteNone of us have ever heard that one. Hahaha. Thank you for the chuckle.....
DeleteRIP Mitch H.
DeleteDo Bigfoots get into fights with each other that result in death? Does the killer just leave the body laying there or do they hide it from humans?
ReplyDeleteWhat would happen if a British Columbia Bigfoot were to somehow meet a Pennsylvania Bigfoot? Would they fight, or would they quickly team up to help each other avoid human confirmation of existence? Or, would the Canadian Bigfoot simply not care if an American Bigfoot is confirmed to exist?
Do all the Bigfoots in the world accurately know that their kind has never been confirmed by humans, or might some of them be wrong and feel that our kind has confirmed them? Do they argue with each other over their personal views on things like that?
Do any young rebellious Bigfoots ever threaten to "turn themselves over to the humans" as a way to manipulate other Bigfoots (like maybe their parents)? Can they blackmail each other with that kind of threat?
Ahhhhhhh you've had one of those nights where you can't sleep and things go round and round in your mind ;) xx
DeleteYes, there are witness reports of sasquatches fighting. After one killed another a witnesses observed it eating the dead one. We really know nothing about their culture.
DeleteAs for the rest of your questions, some odd ones, I'll pass.
Dover - That would be interesting reading. Can you direct me towards that report? Thanks!
DeleteOccams razor circular reasoning lovelock copy paste. ......did I convince you yet?
ReplyDeleteIktomi is a scientist, didn't you know? LOL
Delete^ Ha ha ha ha ha...that is one of the funniest yet !!!
DeleteSomeone's gotta tell Shawn to get a spellchecker or an editor.
ReplyDeleteOccams Razor: All naysayers are morons. The simplest explanation is the best explanation.
ReplyDeleteIt goes like this. In the absence of better evidence, the hypothesis that relies on the fewest assumptions is best.
DeleteWe know people can hoax or be mistaken. We have to assume there is an undiscovered large bipedal primate roaming the woods.
Which hypothesis relies on the fewest assumptions?
His fans still don't get it? For real?
ReplyDeleteTimbergiant is a big fraud and a hoaxer in my opinion. There are way too many signs pointing to it.
Seriously people, dump TGBF like a bad habit.
prove it..are you a professional in the film business? have you got proof? or is it just your opinion? and that everyone must obey? your an idiot...and by the way i don't think much of tgbf but i hate know it all bums
Delete5:38, is that you, Joe, having another meltdown, darling?
Deletewhat 5:38 just said, Mr Ikjoeme, is the famed negative proof you keep incorrectly attributing to the skeptics. Negative proof = prove me wrong otherwise I'm right, not prove something exists otherwise it doesn't.
DeleteThe negative proof fallacy is where one assumes something is true if it cannot be proven false. It can also happen when one assumes that something is false if it cannot be proven true.
DeletePainfully basic stuff.
I agree with Randy....dump this guy !
ReplyDelete