What Rips An Audio Recorder Off Of A Tree And Leaves It Sitting On A Tree Limb?
In this video, Mitchell Waite talks about his use of audio recorders in the field, how he uses them, what they can be used for, and how he sets them up. When putting the recorders out, they were sure to pay attention to their surroundings, after having had previous recorders stolen. So what happened this time around? Some interesting things for sure.
"we still have no proof as to what it was".
ReplyDelete. . . and so it goes.
He insinuated before that probable coyote howls might be a woman's scream from Bigfoot attack. Like a lot of Bigfooters, he wants to attribute too much.
DeleteThis was posted April 19, 2015 to Mitch Waite's facebook page.
Delete"Today is a sad day. I regret that I break this news to those who have not yet heard; my hero, my dad, Mitchell Waite dies this morning. He died suddenly and unexpectedly from massive heart failure."
I guess we know where Santa is the other eleven months of the year.
ReplyDeleteOK, I need you JREF footers to knuckle down and concentrate on this question. This goes back to footers like you pretending to be skeptics.
ReplyDeleteOnly an imbecile would believe that all of Alaskabushpilots life stories are true and that his long winded theories on the mindset of people who believe in Bigfoot are not just psychological projections of his own mental illness.
With that said, he has also admitted on JREF that he has posted on the BFF as a believer for "fun". How do you know he's not just a believer yanking your chains like you do to yourselves ?
I have no clue what point you are even trying to make.
DeleteAre you upset at skeptics or are you just upset at the world in general?
Cheer up, it ain't all bad.
3:12... Comment of the day. Look how much it gets the scepfooters all wound up.
DeletePseudosceptisim is a fundamental quasi-religion.
exactly
DeleteI guess Joe that you addressing the idea that you are a racist got you "all wound up" and therefore must have some truth?
Delete@3:21
DeleteI think he hoping an adult with at least a modicum of integrity would try to answer. Not someone afraid to be kicked out of the pretend skeptic herd.
So what constitutes being in the "skeptic herd"? To merely doubt the idea of Bigfoot? Do you have to post on what was the JREF?
Delete3:41... You would have to first show me and everyone else where I have been remotely racist, for that to wash. It's not like you're too stupid to accomplish that now, is it?
Delete: )
wow, lot of jref/isf footer pwnage today. Go easy on them, they come here to pretend to be superior, not to have their reality stuffed back in their faces.
DeleteThe point wasn't if you were actually racist or not. You seemed to imply that addressing the label of "closet believer" and denying it meant that it had truth.
DeleteI don't deny I have an interest in Bigfoot and people who believe - I'm here. I'm certainly not secretly a believer, though. I cannot deny the possibility I just think it's a low probability. Perhaps I'm lumping too many people into groups, but the idea that I'm really a believer when I discount something is strange to me.
If you're not remotely secretly enthusiastic about the subject, or not remotely worried about people thinking that, then why the reaction? You're anonymous aren't you??
DeleteInterest in a subject and it's culture and posting anonymously doesn't equal secret enthusiasm for the subject. My reaction to being labeled isn't because it hits home, it's because it's simply not true. If I was accused of being a racist I would object regardless if I was anonymous- that doesn't make it true. Besides practically everyone here is essentially anonymous (Brookreson is the only exception I can think of) At the end of the day if you wish to label me a secret believer I will not lose sleep about it. My stated objection is that it's not simply true- your psychoanalysis or not.
DeleteCool bro... That's all I'm saying is if you don't want to come across like that, don't act so perturbed by it, yeah?
DeleteYou now know my feelings on your behaviour, and I know your feelings about it. Let's consider ourselves a little closer.
Lets consider you shutting your fat german trap Joerg
DeleteLet's consider you get some shut eye, actually... You've been perving it up on the Internet for about three days straight now.
Deletehere's a review of the syke's book take it fore what it's worth
ReplyDeleteI enjoyed this book although I did feel slightly cheated by it. There is the suggestion that much more will be revealed than actually is, and we are strung out for too long on very dubious stories that - should we accept the premises of the research - were actually irrelevant to it. The author could have just analysed the mitochondrial DNA of 30 odd supposed yeti hairs and been done with it. Instead he apparently travelled all over the US knocking on trees in the woods and listening to ridiculous stories all of which turned out to be hogwash, as most skeptical people would immediately recognise. Yes, he succeeds in igniting our fascination with the yeti, and the history of the search for the yeti, but the major body of the book is speculation or fiction.
So The Nature of the Beast is an indulgence, if you like wondering what is and what could have been, it is for you, because the basic notion, that other members of our species might have lived alongside us until recently, or the present day, is a logical supposition and an enthralling prospect. The problem Sykes has I think, is he does not have the tools to discern the human and social dimension of that fancy: our need to posit something existing outside us, that links us to our primal nature. He identifies this, and often recounts it in an amusing way, but somehow misses the fact that this construction is the enduring truth of the yeti, not the fake relics.
Without giving too much away, Sykes' concluding discussion of Zana is a case in point. It is of course fascinating that a woman with African DNA was found living in the Caucasus region in the 19th century. But it is not really that remarkable, especially considering the physical prowess hearsay and Sykes attribute to her. And it is not more or less extraordinary than an Australian Aborigine, a native American, an asian Englishman or indeed a white bear. Humans move, migrate, change, adapt. That this very human story needs to be transmitted through the prism of the yeti is telling, through the othering - the estrangement of elements of ourselves in the anthropomorphisation - of nature, we see something of ourselves. Yeti sightings (though there is an urban equivalent in zombies and vampires and such like) happen outside of human societies, in the wilderness. Here, in the elements, ever without the necessary accoutrements to capture the experience, man encounters himself as a scared, dangerous, barking animal.
To conclude then, the search for the yeti, is something of a search for ourselves. I think that’s what Sykes did, and it was enjoyable to read a respected scientist tread on the borders of mysticism. I think he found something very human there.
Summary:
DeleteJoe got BTFO
Joe says "I just have missed that?"
Delete"They will be published in the regular scientific press so I can't be more specific,"
- Bryan Sykes
Oh... And when anthropomorphism manifests into physical and even biological evidence, what does that mean?
: )
yawner
DeleteGet to bed then kid.
DeleteI suppose for a sleepy head that leads to a YOL. I look forward to what Sykes determined when it's finally published.
DeleteI just have a feeling it's going to have as much relevance to Bigfoot as a polar bear study. But we will see.
Delete"They will be published in the regular scientific press so I can't be more specific,"
DeleteThe complaint is in, I repeat, a BIG complaint is in!!!!!!
4:30... What? A study on the existence of archaic humans into modern times, as relevant as a polar bear?
Delete6:28... There's no complaint gone in about you, sorry... You may have to wait a little longer for some creepy level of cyber attention. Get out the house and meet some people, develop some healthy relationships, join a dating site? You never know, you may leave this cyber stalker phase behind you and grow into a nice young man.
Concerning this tree incident we must keep in mind that bigfoot dwells in a physics bound world and a force is any interaction which tends to change the motion of an object. In other words, a force can cause an object with mass to change its velocity (which includes to begin moving from a state of rest), i.e., to accelerate. Force can also be described by intuitive concepts such as a push or a pull. A force has both magnitude and direction, making it a vector quantity. So, absolutely, we're on the verge of discovering this creature and we have science on our side.
ReplyDeleteSo, you're using physics to answer the question, why did the tree fall in the woods, if it made a noise is not dealt with.
DeleteBy your scientific analysis, force was applied to the tree, and in the world of physics it takes sufficient mass to move such a large mass, indicating either an elephant or a bigfoot pushed and rocked the tree until is snapped and fell over.
BenD Dover buttcheeks on toast!!
DeleteYour culinary delight shows your odd sense of taste.
DeleteRegarding Mitch Waite's video, he's very honest about he has no proof of bigfoot on any of the recordings, but did hear noises on all of them, including some grunts, and one of the recorders and pouch was torn off of a three and they later found it up on a branch. And the question is what would remove it from one tree and lay it on top of a branch of another tree.
DeleteHe put out many recorders along what he says is a common route a group of sasquatchs use.