I'm really curious about this photograph from Sasquatch Ontario
.jpg)
Blogger Robert Lindsay shared this photograph allegedly taken from one of Sasquatch Ontario's videos. Is it a Bigfoot? It's hard to tell. Lindsay thinks it could be an adult holding a juvenile. He tells us he's working on an angle, and things could get very interesting. He has diagrams too:
.jpg) |
| Adult Bigfoot holding a juvenile? |
Moe Larry the cheese
ReplyDeletemexicuns fer shure
DeleteWhy haven't you seen carpet before?
DeleteGRAYs having bases and making clones and hybrids, GRAYs controlling Bigfoots to keep people out of these areas
Deleteor get AK to put some lead down range ...
DeleteYea that random bit of fur is a f*cking bigfoot. Jesus f*cking Christ are you footers for real?
ReplyDeleteLooking forward to Joe defending standing today after yesterday's obliteration. Destroyed him. Buried it.
Sorry... Who did that exactly??
DeleteStanding said his sister was not a make up artist but it has been proven she is. He lied. You believe him and gave him money. In summary: you got pwned.
DeleteJoe also believes in bigfoot. That tells you all you need to know.
DeleteHow do you know his sister is a make up artist or is that what someone on this site said? Cause then its hard proof!
DeleteI work in Tv and didn't put much of my own money in but I did hire a makeup person to do Patty sequence and never got close so do us a favour, if its so easy to hoax then shut up and do it or just shut up!
No more parents basement babble! Post up or Shut up!
When Standing shows us all his evidence, and should that not stand up to the hype, then Standing will be 'pwned' and I'll be the first to initiate that, why would that have anything to do with me? Oh that's right... This is the same guy who celebrated the alligator leg that everyone acknowledged wasn't a Bigfoot limb, right? Todd has already stated on a number of occasions that both him and his sister had to say various things to distance themselves from the Bigfoot subject in order to get work. So far, every time someone has brought a seemingly damning case against his character, he's had a very understandable explanation for it. And I have to be honest, if Louise Standing can put together SFX make-up that can prevent an SFX expert from categorically calling a hoax, then why isn't she working on the Hobbit films?
DeleteI'll say it again... I paid for Standings last documentary because in my own principles, it's better to actually take the time to analyse a source before slating it, and I'm very glad I did because the bank runner footage has data in it that is at the very least very interesting.
3:29... You spend all your time reading, watching, listening about a topic only to hate, disinformation and spread abuse, what's more productive considering I can list evidence for an unknown primate that for all your immersing in the subject cannot only muster a meltdown against?
DeleteHaha no one said standing was pwned. Standing is awesome because he pwns the likes of you.
DeleteOh yea that alligator leg. F*cking gator leg what a roarer that was. You got obliterated by that.
Got any evidence to support anything you say yet? I'm guessing no but keep trying. Everyone loves a trier.
What is in the bank runner footage JOE? I always liked that footage from when I first saw it and it has never been analyzed.
DeleteChuck
"AnonymousMonday, November 24, 2014 at 2:17:00 AM PST
DeleteLooking forward to Joe defending standing today after yesterday's obliteration. Destroyed him. Buried it."
Then...
"AnonymousMonday, November 24, 2014 at 3:51:00 AM PST
Haha no one said standing was pwned. Standing is awesome because he pwns the likes of you."
... Are you stable? Sense has never been one of your fortes, has it?
Chuck, if you go here;
http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2014/11/we-finally-have-technology-to-zoom-into.html
The subject in that footage takes three seconds to climb a 20 foot bank, and another second to move from out of view. In the documentary, Todd climbs this bank to show how difficult a bit of terrain to negotiate it is.
Destroyed YOU not standing
DeleteThe bank runner? Is that the one where the guy in a suit is clumsily running along a bank making a right pigs ear out of it?
DeleteAnd this is supposed to be an ellusive species? Hahahahahaha. Crazy hobby.
Standing does not get pwned when someone points out he is a hoaxer. Its like saying the sky is blue. Its obvious. Bigfoot does not exist in reality therefore as easy as 2 + 2 that means he's a hoaxer. He knows *most* people know he's a hoaxer because its only the below average intelligence people that believe this stuff. This is his target market. Joe included.
Delete4:05... Are you stable?
Delete4:09... No, the bank runner is a subject in footage takes three seconds to climb a 20 foot bank, and another second to move from out of view. In the documentary, comparitive footage shows this bank and how difficult a bit of terrain to negotiate it is. Hardly clumsy... But hey, if you'd have seen all this in his documentary, you'd have an angle to argue against, right? : )
4:13... If Standing is a hoaxer, then please, help me out and show me a source that conclusively shows this, it's as simple as that. People are very welcome to their opinion, but I don't see YOU present anything to prevent anyone approaching his yet-to-be-released evidence with an open mind.
The sky is blue = bigfoot does not exist = Standing is a hoaxer = anon at 4:13 is as dense as he comes across. Someone so bad at debating something that is 'so obviously, so easily false' like you shouldn't be making suggestions about anyone else's intelligence level.
: )
Got rekt pretty hard there joe
DeleteAgain Joe there is no debate here. Only you being told you are wrong which is all you can do in these situations.
DeleteWhat you can do is provide something apart from your uneducated, unqualified anonymous opinion to back up anything you say. Someone so bad at debating something that is 'so obviously, so easily false' like you shouldn't be making suggestions about anyone else's intelligence level.
Delete; )
Again there is no debate. Do you even read?
DeleteJOE. Having climbed mountains, actual mountains out in California, circa 1985-1996 when I was in most excellent condition and can testify at how difficult it is to achieve what you call the bank runner did. That one stride that may be as much as 6 foot, maybe more, going up a steep mountainside as if it was not even a challenge was extremely impressive. Seeing it on my HD 50 inch TV, I ran it back and forth many times in the Survivorman episode. I reported this the next day how astonishing that run was. I will check it out on the site you say JOE, but most the time when I type in UK nothing comes up.
DeleteChuck
Oh there's no debate coming from you kiddo, that's right. Moma can't buy your way around here kiddo...
DeleteHey Chuck, what site is that buddy??
DeleteThe one you gave me. I was able to pull it up. It shows up better on TV.
DeleteChuck
Oh I see. Sorry buddy... Yes, its's an impressive climb!
DeleteGo Go Todd xx
DeleteImpressive? Boy you have low standards when it comes to evidence for a non existent creature.
DeleteShow us how unimpressive it is then kiddo... Or the only thing that's non existent is a legitimate argument from you.
DeleteHey Joe, I paid for his documentary as well, when it was released. It's damn good.
Delete: )
DeleteJoe's iq is so low the Clod'
DeleteThinks that homo sapien sapien is a undiscovered primate! All 6 billion of us!
^ didn't know humans are primates.
Delete: p
^ Cornered into admitting that Sasquatch is a modern human(hss)! Haa haahaa
DeleteWhat a "ROPE A DOPE"
Lol..
Cro-Magnon, Otamids, etc, were (maybe are) in fact EARLY modern humans.
DeleteAnd you still didn't know humans are primates.
: )
Robert Lindsay...��smdh
ReplyDeleteSO claimed a Bigfoot got a hold on his camera and took some pictures.
ReplyDeleteOne got ahold of my DVR a while back. It took forever to delete all the Food Network stuff he recorded. He's got a thing for Bobby Flay.
DeleteGator leg.
ReplyDeleteMelba's nephilim and Dogmen.
Sykes zero bigfoots.
Mark Evans and Sykes laughing at footers.
Daisy in a box.
Shooting bigfoot empty theatre premiere.
Justin's made up story.
6 seasons of finding bigfoot yielding zero evidence.
Todd standings muppets.
Cascades carnivore project.
Costume experts pgf examples video never forget.
Joe just can't catch a break.
"The fact that none of these samples turned out to be [Bigfoot] doesn’t mean the next one won’t,” said Bryan Sykes, the Oxford researcher who led the study, according to the Associated Press."
Delete"Mark Evans and Justin Smeja during BBC Documentary;
Another misleading matter in this whole thing is just about that. Where the test samples came from. I've read various articles that claim a little less than half of the samples came directly from bigfoot sightings. Really? How so? Because someone reported a sighting in a general area, and the hairs were found in that same general area? Did someone pluck the hair directly from a bigfoot creature, or see a clump fall out as it ran away? I'm fairly certain you could find all kinds of hairs in my front yard, that doesn't mean they came from the rabbit I saw out there. This is exactly what happened during the documentary about the Sykes study where Justin Smeja was interviewed about his claim to have shot and killed at least one bigfoot. It was well known within the community that Justin submitted a tissue sample to Sykes that was believed to be that of a bear. This was known information before hand. Yet when the documentary was released, it was edited to make it sound like Smeja claimed to have acquired the tissue sample directly from the bigfoot itself. This was not only misleading, it was an outright lie. Regardless of how you feel about Smeja, or what your opinion is on his claim, he was in fact misrepresented and lied about during this documentary. That is a fact."
- Matt K
You don't find a single thing in the forest at night with a film crew screaming about the place.
Let's compare the Cascade Carnivore Study to the size of the PNW. Then, let's compare the number of months that study had gone on for, to that of the evidence accumulation for Sasquatch during the same length of time. Bigfoot ain't a wolverine, a wolf, a grizzly, a lynx... It's a type of human that has evaded people and in particular; technology for this long. Why? Because it is a a big pink flag in a see of green... It is an intrusion in a home where they know the slightest bit of detail to stay one step ahead of all other apex predators, and us to survive. Both animals and humans leave sign of their passage in addition to tracks. These include chewed or bruised vegetation, droppings, scratches in tree bark, hairs snagged on branches or in bark, rubbings on trees, gnawed bones, feathers, opened nuts, dens, burrows, and nests. You may also find well-worn trails and runways through the grass that many animals use regularly. These signs may not be obvious at first, but with practice, you will see them. Sasquatch could see sign of human interference and things like trail cams having been erected very easily. Natives who are some of the very best trackers in the world refer to this creature as the "boss of the woods" or "master of the mountain". What's more... I as soon as you are presented with trail camera photos that do appear to show Sasquatch, it's hurling abuse time.
Never forget? I think you'd rather forget this;
http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2014/09/this-is-saddest-video-of-week.html?m=0
Glad I could help.
The best trackers in world are white rednecks in those rural areas known as "the sticks". Hunting is learned at an early age.
DeleteCopy paste meltdown was to be expected
DeleteYeah... We'll soon see how long that goes without an intelligent counter argument.
Delete: )
1 line to smoke everything you have ever said:
DeleteBigfoot don't exist.
Oh no... You're right, you did it alright!
DeleteMuppet.
DeleteMaybe... Got any proof?
DeleteBunch of morons.
ReplyDeletehttp://squatchdetective.wordpress.com/2014/11/23/todd-standing-the-history-we-forget/
ReplyDeleteA person here has been presented with an overwhelming amount of evidence showing his sources lack credibility. That person offers up an excuse for every single one. Then asks for an intelligent debate. As a skeptic here you only have to step back and look at the claims being made and realize there is no convincing these people, it is the same with any religion. And Dyer, Meldrum, Standing, Moneymaker are the televangelists. You can only smile at knowing these people are paying a price for their faith in a mythological entity. A real price that comes out of their wallet. Still, dont feed the excuse troll, it makes him feel special. Let him continue to troll the few people here that believe him unconditionally. Just step back and smile because you are smarter than that.
you were asked the other day to show your arguments that show mine to have no credibility.... You did another runner. My 'excuses' are in fact the moments your efforts at disinformation fail.
DeletePsuedoskepticism is a fundamentalist, quasi-religion... And you still haven't proved any of your points.
; )
:-D
DeleteMy points have been shown. I will continue to pop and and post them from time to time just so any newcomers here might see what this person is all about. Until that time I will smile and not feed the troll.
What's the matter? Anyone would think you're scared? Post your arguments, come on bro, you've proved it all right?
Delete: p
Or is it that maybe you've proved nothing and are more presoccupied with me than the subject matter, and HOPE you can try and convince SOMEONE that you've done anything of the sort?
DeleteHa ha ha ha!!
Does being skeptical of online dating services being hooker free make me a fundamentalist quasi-whatever you said? I'm also skeptical the Raiders will make the playoffs. That's making a call based on available information. Not blind faith and wishful thinking. I don't get the religious part. Unless you're an idiot. THEN it all makes sense.
DeleteThat's all very well, but you're not being skeptical, you stop asking the questions when your preference of conclusion and ignore key information that renders those conclusions unable to stand... Heuristical ideals never did account for ALL the 'available information'.
DeleteThere's nothing more fundamentalist than someone who not only denies what tens of thousands of people have witnessed, but also fails to understand consistent scientific method. Allow me to spell it out; Psuedoskepticism is a fundamentalist, quasi-religion.
Tens of thousands? I think I just heard your ass pop shut after you pulled that one out.
DeleteDo you know how long this subject had been agknowledged by cultural and contemporary references? That figure is being modest.
DeleteDo you know how many morons insist the moon landings were faked? Or thought the world was hollow? Who gives a rats ass how many people believe something when they are flat wrong? Again, you pulled the figure out of your ass and you know it. As to being modest, if you really believed that you would have threw out a larger number at the start. So either way you are a fucking liar. You A. Made up a number or B. You intentionally gave a smaller number. You have more motive to do A than B. Your full of shit and a waste of time. I used to enjoy your post's but damn have you went over the cliff.
DeleteDid I mention, that the duration this subject has been agknowledged by cultural and contemporary references, that it accounts for ten thousand years (the natives say 50), with modern eyewitness reports just scraping the tip of the iceberg due to fear of ridicule. That figure is, undoubtedly being modest my friend.
DeleteShut your pie hole liar.
DeleteMake me Einstein.
DeleteYeah, the unfortunate thing about this is Todds reputation is so bad, I dont even think there was enough attention gathered to even warrant someone blowing this thing open. Judging by the vast amount of empty seats at his conference I dont think anyone even cares enough to try and expose this. I myself feel that there are always going to be the few Joes in the world that believe anything and everything, and Standing would have those people even if he went on stage a presented a compilation of Sasquatch farting noises. He isnt making huge waves, let him make a few bucks off of gullible people. Oh yeah, did you guys here Dyer got another Bigfoot? This one is for real.
ReplyDeleteStop crying, let's see his evidence first.
DeleteWhos crying, Im laughing. Someone could show you a video on how they made the muppet and you still would stand by his footage.
DeleteHey, why don't you show me where I've claimed that they're real? Post a direct quote, I'll wait around for you to come up with the goods.
DeleteNargh! You're a real cry baby, you'll convince no one you're laughing behind these long paragraphs of foot stamping.
: )
I wonder why he didn't show the great evidence like he said he would. I believe he said he would show an edited version of his film.
DeleteOnly Todd can answer that... What's for sure is that I refuse to judge until I've seen it.
DeleteLast night I saw a documentary about bigfoot. It featured a well known biologist Mark Evans and a DNA specialist Bryan Sykes. They travelled all over the world testing "bigfoot" samples and they all came back as known animals. I thought I would give you all a heads up on this if you really believe there is a bigfoot.
ReplyDeleteHJ
Update!
DeleteSykes is still testing samples with a hybrid study in the process of being done... Even theorising as to what people are seeing are Neanderthals.
No, no... The pleasure's all mine.
No study to speak of.
DeleteJust fears and delusions amok.
Appearing during the first half of Coast to Coast AM on Friday, July 27, 2012, Rhettman Mullis brought listeners up to date on his most recent Bigfoot research findings. Mullis, team leader for Bigfootology, is a frequent guest on Coast to Coast and this time around he kept listeners enthralled with his tale of Patrick, the human-Bigfoot hybrid. Mullis is working closely with Bryan Sykes, former professor of Human Genetics at University of Oxford. Together they're amassing a large collection of hair samples, believed to be Bigfoot in origin, and DNA sampling will commence later this year at Lausanne Museum of Zoology in Switzerland. In his quest for the ultimate answers to the existence and origins of Bigfoot, Mullis was able to track down Dr. Ed Fusch who, several years ago, began cataloging the stories and locations of various Bigfoot sightings in western areas of the United States. One of his reports focused on a story from the Colville Indian tribe in northeast Washington. The intriguing tale was about a man named Patrick, who was believed to be a human-Bigfoot hybrid. Patrick and his wife had five children, two boys and three girls. Both boys and one of the girls died at an early age, leaving only Mary Louise and Magdeline to carry on Patrick's lineage. Both women are in their 70s and Mullis has managed to track them down to a general location but won't reveal that information, for obvious reasons. Efforts are being made to find the women and involve them in Sykes' DNA research project, even as we speak. Mullis says both women are aware of who, or what, they're descended from and both have approached their mother who verified that they are indeed the resulting offspring of a Bigfoot father and a human mother."
DeleteFear? I'm not the one self serving up reassurance buddy.
Well, he at least kept one person enthralled apparently. Bigfoot father and a human mother you say? Um right... You're serving up something all right. Bullshit mostly.
DeleteHominids like Neanderthal successfully interbred with us, just sit tight and wait for what happens of this... It's all BS when you've got nothing but BS between your ears.
DeleteYes they did. Tens of thousands of years ago. I have seen any lately though. Have you?
DeleteYou have, have you? No... It's hard living in the UK, I know plenty of people who have though, there's also whole databases full. Let me know if you ever need pointing in that general direction.
Delete"A boy of 11 who is covered in hair may be a throwback to our caveman past, say doctors.
ReplyDeleteBekzat Tazhikhan was born with a one coating that has now grown so thick and dark school bullies were calling him wolf boy.
Medics in Astana, Kazakhstan told local TV he has atavism, a condition where people are born with features which vanished generations before."
Please can we have a link? xx
DeleteSorry Eva, I got this from a newspaper in the UK - doesn't seem to be much info about it online unfortunately except about 'atavism' in general.
DeleteZana came to mind when I was reading it hence thought I'd share it here as a starting point...
Just saying guy...
my dong and balls have elongated hairs all over them. I also discovered large patches of hairs under my arm pit regions and atop my head. Me fears I am developing the wolfman-sendrome.
ReplyDeleteOr you're dad was a sasquatch? At least one person around here thinks it's plausible.
Deleteme dawgs traks tham bigfeet shure do
DeleteNot sure why I come here...I need therapy apparently.
ReplyDeleteJOE AND EVA R. Thought you two might enjoy this. Only 40 seconds. Eagle with camera flys over London.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.coasttocoastam.com/photo/view/fly_like_an_eagle_over_london/70305
Chuck
Hi Chuck...I checked that out too. Pretty awesome. Thanks for sharing.
DeleteThanks for the link Chuck.
DeleteWhat i would give to fly xx
DeleteBigfoot student, if you're interested in tree structure evidence, I have it all! Just email me.
ReplyDeletedrkiray@Comcast.net
I can testify. DS has got some awesome structures. Lot of bigfoot activity in his area.
DeleteChuck
I'll chime in to say that trees put inside other trees are not natural, and when DS shows you the consistency, it's quite amazing.
DeleteYes it's so amazing that Shawn or no one else for that matter will share it....good stuff lol you rock Dr scotch
DeleteThanks fellas! I found an awesome new spot! My phone died as soon as I got there..but I'll have some new pics next week!
DeleteShawn's really curious about the pic above, and anything blurry, or someone in a suit, but not real evidence! I completely understand.
DeleteHey Chuck, I sent Joe an email, have you ever heard of an "Albatwitch?" Someone said that is what I filmed and took a pic of?
DeleteAlbawitch is an old Cheyenne word that roughly translates to " finger on lens".
Delete^My anti-robot word was "dnaturd" just now! Effing awesome!
DeleteNo DS, have never heard of an Albatwitch.
DeleteChuck
^ Refuses to hang out with the Cheyenne. Bigot.
DeleteOWL!
ReplyDeleteDeep fried or smoked?
DeleteDr scotch..try sending Shawn a written plea on the back of a 50$ Bill bet he changes his mind
ReplyDelete^ That was then,this now! Better
Deletemake it a C note..
He should be paying me.
DeleteIf he's decided it's not good enough to run, I doubt you could claim he should be paying you. Unless he needs a back adjustment.
DeleteWe will have to get Meldrum,Bindenhangel and Standing on this one,they should be able to figure this trail cam photo out after that shocking NEW evidence they presented at that summit. I just bet all those attendees were so glad/happy that they shelled out the money to attend it .........
ReplyDelete