Here's how you get on a TV show with Survivorman Les Stroud
Alright, Bigfooters. Though this latest announcement from Les Stroud isn't directed towards Bigfoots, it will be worth a shot to spend a couple of nights on an expedition with Les. All he needs from you is a video clip of yourself probably showing why he should pick you. The official announcement isn't made yet, so you'll have to hold onto your videos before you send it in:
For those who have no interest in Survivorman Bigfoot here is the final announcement i have been teasing you with for quite some time....first i will say that this is a preliminary announcement - soon my office will release an official press release for this and lay out all of the details: I am going to hold a contest - one where you will need to film yourself (short clips) - and the winner gets.......wait for it.......finally after all these years of constant requests: TO COME OUT WITH SURVIVORMAN (ME) ON A SURVIVAL EXPEDITION TO BE FILMED FOR THE TV SERIES!!!!!!!
so like i said - stay tuned for all the details and an official press release.......L
first ?
ReplyDeleteObama administration has dragged its feet on revoking Obamacare coverage for people who can’t prove U.S. citizenship or legal residency, allowing some of the estimated 11 million illegal immigrants in the U.S. to continue enjoying taxpayer-funded benefits.
DeleteFREE HEALTHCARE : )
Big Joan "Thinks he will become a Star
ReplyDeleteBecause of his discusting ability to suck a basketball thru a garden hose!
ALL SUPER FRIENDS MAKE ME WANNA
""PUKE"".......FACT!!!
^ talent!
DeleteNo Thanks to the survivor man invite. And as far as this blowjob skeptic above my post.... Go suck your dogs puppy maker! A-HOLES that don't "believe" yet come too this blog daily and read the articles and fight like children with us are the most repulsive pigs the internet can offer. And just for your delight cuz, you have been owned so many times by joe fitzs it's disgustingly funny. You are the virus known as "The Obama Voter!" We can smell your welfare benefit receiving ass a mile a way. So keep on keeping on with your childish comments. just letting you know that A.) You Suck and B.) You still SUCK! A-HOLE!
DeleteHaaaahaaa,haaa
DeleteDICKWEED!!! Haaahaa,
1:30 ...oooh,a sensitive point has been touched ! ,.try rubbing it !
DeleteSilly role players
ReplyDeleteCome out the closet bro... You don't play the role of 'skeptic' too well.
Delete: p
it`s nice and snug in here and i have the added bonus of peeping at yo moma
Delete^ I guess you have the strap on whistling Dixie
ReplyDeletewhy,you cheap punk !
DeleteWhen making up your bigfoot stories be sure to include the following:
ReplyDeleteIt was too big to be a person
It definitely want a bear
It stunk (optional)
It was covered in hair
It had huge shoulders and long arms
I'm out on the woods a lot and it definitely was not a known animal
That should just about do it:)
Enjoy being welcomed into the role playing club. Remember do not talk about it being role playing, just go along with it all and enjoy the ride:)
Another impatient role playing nerd that has to pretend he's a 'skeptic' in case his mummy finds him interested in Bigfoot; who just wants his body so he can come out the closet. Hey... If he can attain some level of attention he lacks so much in the real world in the process... Bonus! Why lose cyber pride asking questions on the topic when you can post 'skeptical' arguments that have threatened your closet enthusiasm and get others to counter them up for you, reinforcing that closet enthusiasm, eh?
DeletePatience bro and in the mean time, enjoy the subject matter.
Baddie^
Delete^^ hey joe,how much did you pay for your pair of "bigfoot" slippers ?
Delete1:25 you missed the essential
Delete"i`ve been a hunter since i was 6 years old"
Cyber nerds calling in life long hunters... the audacity knows no limits.
DeleteA Welsh nerd who has never left his basement telling people in North America what is in their forests. The audacity knows no limits.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
Deletepathetic is your grammar, you hillibilly
Deletei gits some eddicateshun caws i gits some schoolin
DeleteIt would be audacious if I was to NOT have the an exceeded understanding of what's probably only a hundred yards from your window... Providing you're living in the country side that is, to which if you're not, then this country boy can state with all honesty you're pretty much as pathetic as it gets.
DeleteBetter for you? Ha ha ha ha!!
No. More and more pathetic grammar. You truly are a Welsh my friend.
DeleteComing from an anonymous Einstein without a come back... I can assure you I'm contented.
Delete: p
^Welsh redneck
Delete9:48 dont wast yur time on Joe! As his IQ Is as low, A
DeleteReal one dimensional dummy, with No sence of humor. Ha ha ha ha ha ha.
^ lol, what a dufus
Delete^ irony indeed from a person calling themself "mr bean".....that`s is the most unaware post i`ve seen in a while
DeleteOut of all the commentators on this site, Joe F IS a "Big foot expert' in his own right, by all the intelligent comments he has made.
DeleteHe's more of a "Big foot Expert' than most of the "Well known" big foot experts, that have no clue to what they are doing.
Their evidence, or lack thereof, is 25+ years of searching and finding nothing!
Keep up the good Joe F!
You should know who this is.
Yes yes yes we all know who you are,matter of fact we all know more about You than you know about you??
Delete09-19-14
ReplyDeleteNever forget!
I would try if I were you;
Deletehttp://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2014/09/this-is-saddest-video-of-week.html?m=0
Monkey suits gallore!
DeleteNargh... CGI, foam suits that weren't available in the 60's, Gemora suit that's only ever shown in low lighting to hide suit anomalies and a bunny rabbit suit lacking proportions made my a guy who states the PGF probably isn't a man in a suit... Gallore!
DeleteHaha dreamer
DeleteI don't spend every waking hour looking for moneky suits, bro.
DeleteSame.
DeleteYou spend every waking hour along for them and then denying their very existence.
I can't even understand that.
DeleteAlong = asking
DeleteSmoked.
Nope... I keep asking for them only to get CGI, foam suits that weren't available in the 60's, Gemora suit that's only ever shown in low lighting to hide suit anomalies and a bunny rabbit suit lacking proportions made my a guy who states the PGF probably isn't a man in a suit... The only think I deny is the seriousness of those suggestions and your alleged intelligence.
DeleteWhat you on about? That video had much more than that. Loads of standard fur monkey suits from the 30s onwards.
DeleteNo... It had CGI, foam suits that weren't available in the 60's, Gemora suit that's only ever shown in low lighting to hide suit anomalies and a bunny rabbit suit lacking proportions made my a guy who states the PGF probably isn't a man in a suit... I took the video apart segment for segment here;
Deletehttp://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2014/09/this-is-saddest-video-of-week.html?m=0
... Enjoy.
^ i find it difficut to believe that a convincing costume could not have been made then..there are enough fabulously crafted articles and items that have been made by individuals throughout time..the "we didn`t possess the technology then" just isn`t a convincing argument..i don`t doubt bigfoot is real but this costume argument doesn`t make the grade.
DeleteWhat you believe is very much respected, but when the facts point to techniques and materials unavailable in the 60's, then I would suggest you re-evaluate.
DeleteHow does the costume argument make the grade? Because research needs to be tested. When the source is presented as that by a group of scientists spanning every relevant field, then it is required by the processes of scientific verification to oblige that requirement. If it cannot be tested to the point that organic tissue can be replicated, then the default position is that the subject is indeed organic and a major cog in the sources required towards proving the species.
Bill Munns approach to the pgf is very strange indeed.
ReplyDeleteHe claims he looks at it with no bias but that is nonsense. From the start he set out to prove patty was a bigfoot rather than taking an objective look at it.
What he should have done, as a costume expert is first think as an unbiased person that patty is likely a costume as no bigfoots have been confirmed to exist. From there his only real way to proceed given his expertise is to therefore create a costume to replicate patty.
Does he even try this? Nope.
Wait, I thought he was a costume expert?
Instead he writes 20 chapters saying why he is "the man" and why what he says has to be true.
He then trys to divert attention with nonsense such "no hoaxer would turn off the camera while filming therefore patty is the real deal folks". Sillyness. Munns fails to think like a hoaxer which is ultimately his downfall.
Where is the costume attempt?
The only thing he attempted was to build a mask. And he did this by purposely building a mask that he knew would not fit. What's the point in that? How about build a mask that fits and then compare it to patty. The reasons are obvious.
So Mr Munns if you are reading this why did you not build a patty suit?
I believe the "we didn`t have the ability to make these type of suits then" belief is nonsense...people have been creating and making fabulous things since time immemorial...items that are not reproduced today by "new" technology...i DO however,believe the patterson/gimlin film to be of a real creature.
Delete^^ Gee...I just didn`t think of that at the time ..thanks for pointing it out to me..maybe I`ll have another attempt but using your method of course.
DeleteHow come u guys r not talking about Stacey browns bf DNA proof etc?? Just happen yesturday !!! And how come u guys don't have the thermal footage yet that "Les S" got recently ??? Best thermal yet ! Finally someone with clear thermal even if it was from 120 yards, u can see all the detial on the animal!!! Awsome footage !!! Hope u guys post it sooner than later!!!!
DeleteTTL!!
Nice troll attempt 6/10
Delete"He claims he looks at it with no bias but that is nonsense. From the start he set out to prove patty was a bigfoot rather than taking an objective look at it."
DeleteAnd this is a problem how? The scientific protocol is to sustain sufficient evidence to support the premise posed. To suggest that the default position SHOULD be something is both ignorant of the supporting data both before and after the source was filmed, and is merely more evidence of using scientific method as if it were a free thinking prejudizing body.
"What he should have done, as a costume expert is first think as an unbiased person that patty is likely a costume as no bigfoots have been confirmed to exist."
Isn't that assuming that your preferred default position (one you cannot support) is that of impartiality? What a silly unbeknownst narcissist this little nerd is. You see, the truth is it's very difficult to be objective here, but what we CAN do is look at both sides of the coin and test the source adequately... Something you haven't done yet, remember?
"From there his only real way to proceed given his expertise is to therefore create a costume to replicate patty.
Does he even try this? Nope."
Actually, fundemental data was all accumilated in line with him making his own mask, and then calculating the subjects entire body proportions.... For example... The shoulder joint and base of the neck of Patty require to be shifted forward actually into the neck of a normal human for the eyes of the 'mask' to align with normal human proportions. It is therefore impossible to get the mask to fit on the shoulders of a normal human and maintain the rest of the proportions to fit on a normal person in a suit. Also... It is near enough impossible to get the proportions of a normal human into the alleged mask, that's not considering that the lips open.
"Wait, I thought he was a costume expert?
Instead he writes 20 chapters saying why he is "the man" and why what he says has to be true."
I find it really funny that some twonk who isn't aware of very basic, fundemental information that easily counters his arguments in the first place, should then suggest that anyone with a resume like this;
http://www.billmunnscreaturegallery.com/bmcgsite_036.htm
... Isn't an expert.
"Munns fails to think like a hoaxer which is ultimately his downfall."
Well... He's actually got one over on most hoaxers, considering he's worked around SFX for 30 years.
"Where is the costume attempt?"
DeleteIt started with manufacturing a mask... Ending up in a realisation that the proportions cannot be replicated. For further examples; the arm length of Patty is 10% longer than that of a normal human in comparison proportion & scale, the 10% being in the shoulder area. When matching this over that of a normal human, the problem is evident when trying to accommodate this in comparison to a normal human, Patty's knees fall way shorter. Bill even extends this to show the possibility of using football shoulder pads, and it still cannot match the proportions of a normal human. Bill also extends the comparison image's scale of Patty by 25% , but you still have the arm with bending fingers reaching far lower than the proportions of what a normal human can achieve in a suit. We also see something very obvious in the junction of two points of the right leg when pasted on top of eachother, from the hip socket. It is here where you have an amazing example of the posture of the upper and lower leg of Patty; the upper leg is far shorter. The crotch area of Patty is far more higher than the average human norm and like Bill States; "when you put a costume on, it always adds, it never subtracts". If you were to put the 'costume' on a human being, then we would expect the crotch area to be lower than what is clearly not the case when comparing the proportions. This of course, is without going into sooooo much more information regarding the alleged fur cloth, etc, to which Bill has spent much time explaining to which in turn; there is not one suit expert to have come forward to contradict.
"The only thing he attempted was to build a mask"... Yes, and got the very obvious results of comparitive scale.
"And he did this by purposely building a mask that he knew would not fit. What's the point in that? How about build a mask that fits and then compare it to patty. The reasons are obvious. So Mr Munns if you are reading this why did you not build a patty suit?"
I think you need to watch a Monsterquest or something bro, honestly, start with the basics. Bill takes exactly what you see in the footage, images of every frame that shows the head proportions, calculates and then bases his effort at a mask around that. For example... If you were to incoorporate a recieding forehead on the proportions of a normal human's head mask to, the forehead would have to transcend the coned head height that you see on the subject in the footage. You would have a far taller coned head, not to mention the eye socket proportions mentioned not long ago... You don't have to be a costume expert to think along the lines of common sense, this is why most people have the edge on you, not to mention Munns.
So you question him for not taking the stance of what you expect from a costume expert and then condemn him for using an approach that's not only natural for one (most costume designers start with the head), considering all the data in that footage that's obviously going to be the focal point of study. Are you ok?? Are you dumb or just been at the desktop too long??? The only issue we have here, is the ironic nature of your arguemt, in that you cry costume but can't get a damn thing close to it, even an expert that should be in your camp telling you otherwise.
Ouch!
hey joe,how much did you pay for your pair of "bigfoot" slippers ?
DeleteI don't wear slippers sorry bro.
Delete^ c`mon now..don`t be shy
DeleteAt a Big foot Convention, I bought an official "Tree Knocker" bat, from Bobo!
Deletewith it, I Knocked" all the Big foots in the Forest.
I took a l look at the breakdown THINKER THUNKER did with the big red that was posted here last Saturday I believe. TT did a pretty darn good job of bring out things that just was not seen in the original and said no CGI and no suit and I have to agree. He also caught it leaving and though the form was blurry it was far wider than the tree it got behind. TT is getting quite the following and for good reason, his work is cutting edge right now. Of the over three hundred comments he had on this video as of yesterday around 90 percent were most positive and from some people I recognize. Some of his videos have garnered over 200,000 visits to date so word has gotten out. I think the back of big red's head and shoulder looks a lot like the Temagami bigfoot from Ontario. By contrasting colors he was able to produce a very young one clinging to the mother's shoulder like happens in the primate world and human. One critic said it is too small for a baby compared with the head. If their young are close in size to human then this is what you would expect due to the mother being 4 to 5 times more massive than an average human, and it was really at the top of the shoulder area.
ReplyDeleteTT introduced a new term that is endearing. RANT CAM. Something the good folks ( you know who you are ) can associate with around here.
Chuck
Agreed Chuck
DeleteI also noticed a few names of the comments old racer x not happy with tt pretty much the whole tazer gang are the 10 percent
Very much agreed Chuck!!
DeleteI did see Mike Brookreson and Sharon Day like it. May be right about the tazer gang. There were so many great comments it is a shame they do not show up around here. It would benefit this site greatly.
DeleteChuck
Cbrippee!!! It's TTL!! Why don't u send me a email???
ReplyDeletehauts1978@outlook.com
Let's talk u seem to have interest in the subject and I have a lot comin up in the next 5 weeks on the subject !
TTL!!
Dude your the biggest troll on here .stop with the pimpin kinda funny how you always have the latest information from certain folks
Delete^ hey i`m after the biggest troll title !
DeleteY'all can jest step on back!!
DeleteIm the BIGGEST Troll on this site Hands down!!!
I'm going for it.
ReplyDeleteNo surprise there Rictor,Good luck you sexy beast!
DeleteMore or les just looking for love
DeleteTake Joe with you.
Delete^ don`t forget his bigfoot slippers and bathrobe
Delete^ I'm shure Joe looks simply
Delete"Adorable" in his nitey nite attire,, Haw!
Oh boy. This looks like a half step over from People of Walmart.
ReplyDeletetham walmart zombies thays gits U reel quik lack
DeleteThanks to Todd Standing for making Les relevant again. Les survivor man series went into the tank, so now he is becoming , another 'Big foot expert". Pretty soon, he will be selling DVD'S, giving lecture tours, taking out expeditions etc. throw in a few 'sightings", throw in a few "thermals' and he's got the Cred's!
ReplyDeleteThere are only "so many" places a person can realistically be sent out to survive left in this world.
DeleteLes hit alot of 'em...what's he supposed to do ?
Do it for 20 years ? We all get the gist and it (the show) basically ran it's course.
He's had some unexplainable bigfoot (?) experiences in the past and is persuing that. Good for him ? Jealous??
6 56. I agree. Can only keep doing the same thing for so long. I of course could not be happier he chose this progression. Gear up with food and technology and stay in a place for a good while. He had some possible interaction in the previous post, so far so good.
DeleteChuck
^ question...with all this "habituation" going on why,oh WHY,is there NEVER any pictures taken with any type of camera ? ..all the supposed night time creeping of bigfoot collecting his dinner which is conveniently laid out for him...but oh NO,there`s never ANY images taken of him doing this ...I do wonder WHY NOT ???
Delete9 26. They are out there, just have to know which is legitimate. Filming from far away or into the woods just does not work well enough. Temagami is one of the best filmed.
DeleteChuck
^ well ok...i`ll see if i can find a video of anything..i do believe that bigfoot must exist but it can be frustrating as a watcher from the sidelines so to speak..there`s also a large amount of unforgivable errors of late.
DeleteDo footers really think bigfoot exists?
ReplyDeleteI highly doubt it.
Ones that have experiences think it's possible.
DeleteHence - why they come here.
Now why YOU come here is another topic completely.
Because it makes your mom get freaky
DeleteNOoooo MOM is DEAD
DeleteJoe thinks the guys on Alaskan Monsters are the real deal.
ReplyDeleteJoe is mentally challenged.
Deletethat expert tracker FACE trax tham critters fer reel
Delete^^ yeah but now he has a nice pair of fireside bigfoot slippers/bedtime sneakers that go along nicely with the bigfoot dressing-gown...the one with the bigfoot stencil on the front...kinda handy as it hides the dribble.
DeleteGot monkey?
ReplyDeletebzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz...PLUCK....reel, reel reel..........
DeleteIS IT SAFE !!!
DeleteThanks, but no thanks.
ReplyDeleteQuis custodiet ipsos custodies
DeletePlease take Daniel Campbell (aka, that hair in a light socket Giorgio guy from Ancient Aliens). Because we want to see his head handed to him by a Bigfoot that he does not believe in.
ReplyDeleteuh-oh...i`m in trouble...thinking maybe bigfoot is real...what has come over me ?
ReplyDelete